Good boy, good girl, good cat.

by Kyeli on December 29, 2008

Ever notice how “good” has become synonymous with “obedient”?

I took my cat, Phineas, to the vet a few weeks ago. When I picked him up, the vet and the nurse said to me, “He’s such a good cat!” They went on to tell me how he didn’t fuss or fight them and was very well-behaved.

Sometimes when Dru and I go shopping, people remark on what a good boy he is – he’s quiet and a little shy in public, so he tends to come across differently than he does at home.

This is related to fierceness, which we talk about a lot. Society has this myth wherein one must be complacent and obedient or one is labeled violent, and there’s no middle ground. But that’s stupid and wrong.

Fierceness is the middle ground.

You don’t have to be a doormat or a steamroller. You can stand in your power and hold your own boundaries without trampling anyone else, but we’re certainly not taught that. And it’s reinforced in the way we talk about our animals and our children – if they’re complacent and obedient, they’re good. If they whine, struggle, fidget, cry, or stand up for themselves, they’re bad.

If Phineas had fought the vet when she gave him a shot – if he’d attempted to defend his boundaries and protect himself – she wouldn’t have praised him or called him a good cat. More likely, she would have said he was a troublemaker or difficult. We do the same thing to our children. When a baby is quiet and doesn’t cry often, they’re referred to as a good baby, and vice versa, when a baby cries a lot, be it colic or grumpiness or whatever, they’re lumped in with the bad kids. If a child tires of being bullied and finally fights back, that child is often treated as the aggressor, even though they were defending themselves and their boundaries – often in the only way they know how.

Often, we justify boundary breaching with “it’s for their own good.” It’s certainly “for his own good” for Phineas to get a shot if he’s sick. It’s “for his own good” for Dru to take medicine if he’s really sick. But when they defend their boundaries, when they protest or struggle – that’s natural behavior! It’s not bad or wrong, it’s in our nature to defend ourselves against perceived attacks.

Getting a shot certainly seems like an attack, especially if you don’t speak the language of the shot-giver.

It’s also in our nature to protest when our state is out of balance. When a child has to sit still, it’s unsurprising when they get fidgety – but only the sitters get the praise.

I’d like fierce to mean good. I’d like to hear people say, “What a good cat! He defended his boundaries when he was attacked!” or “What a good girl she’s being; she’s crying because she’s hungry!” If we could shift our viewpoints when we look at our children and our animals, we could shift our viewpoints when we look at ourselves and each other – and fierceness would become commonplace.

I’d like that.


Have you read our book, The Usual Error? It teaches you how to solve communication issues with compassion and understanding, how to get rid of needless conflict from your life, how to make your relationships smoother, and how to generally be happier. Also, the illustrations are super cool. (:

You can buy it on Amazon or read it for free online.

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

James | Dancing Geek December 29, 2008 at 5:58 pm

Since I’m currently reading Steve Pavlina’s book I’m thinking Power! And I like the word fierce, it reminds me of my wolf, my sister’s lioness (all in my head, just so we’re clear) and I’m with you all the way Kyeli. I don’t see teacher’s rewarding fierceness any time soon, it’s not what school is about, but we can reward it everyone we meet and start a mini-revolution!

Power to the fierce! :)

Reply

JoVE December 29, 2008 at 7:44 pm

I like the word fierce, too. Worth pondering more, I think.

Reply

Hayden Tompkins December 30, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Love. This. Post.

So true.

Reply

Green December 30, 2008 at 3:48 pm

That may be, but there do need to be boundaries. I do try to avoid the words “good” and “bad” with Sylvia because they’re so constantly conflicting terms. Sometimes ‘good’ is standing your ground, but sometimes ‘good’ IS being considerate and polite. It depends on the situation. Instead I try to be specific. “Wow that was so clever!” “Aww.. too messy!” Good and bad.. as words they’re meaningless to me. Because sometimes obedient is what you need.. like if being good is defined as “not spreading poo on the walls.” But I do agree that sitting still and taking shots from scary strangers is NOT good. For kids or kitties.

In general, I’m a fan of specificity. Fierce is a good word.. if that’s what you’re being. But sometimes good is polite, clever, or considerate. And I don’t think that polite and considerate necessarily mean obedient. I’m not an advocate of obedience, but I am a fan of being kind and considerate.

For example: my mom raised us with “that is unacceptable behavior” rather than “that was bad!”. I think it sends a clearer message about things like hitting or biting.. It also establishes that “what you just did” was not okay, but that doesn’t mean YOU are not okay. I think your post relates more to the problems of “good”, but I think “bad” has just as many problems.

Reply

Tanya December 31, 2008 at 12:49 pm

This is actually kind of a rant I hit, too. I don’t talk about it much because my eyes start shooting flames and I end up doing Gojira-style roars…

Did you know that, if a bunch of adults tell a kid to do stuff and the kid doesn’t do what they want, or talks back to them, they have a freakin’ DSM psychiatric label and DISORDER for that? True. http://www.mentalhealth.com/dis1/p21-ch05.html is an easy-to-read version of it.

So, in short: ADULT wants kid to do stuff, ADULT doesn’t like kid’s response, ADULT characterizes kid as “resentful” or “defiant” or “deliberately annoying” and the KID is the one with the disorder. There are no words for how angry this makes me.

*ROARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*

Reply

Beth December 31, 2008 at 9:49 pm

The issue I am seeing with this proposal is that fierceness, as you are defining it, is a lack of communication and a lack of compromise. If the child is communicating “I am hungry” and negotiating that, this seems like good behavior. If the child is working within a pre-negotiated structure and quietly awaiting dinner time, this is also good behavior. “Passivity” as you see it is simply working within the Social Contract; there’s nothing “bad” about that, any more than there is with any other communication/negotiation/contract.

Shouldn’t we be focusing on communication as the goal, not arbitrarily held boundaries?

Reply

china March 3, 2009 at 12:28 pm

when i was a toddler my family got a cat and my dad named it phineas ubiquitous cat.

Reply

Kate May 30, 2011 at 4:54 pm

I read this a while ago, and started telling my cats ‘thank you’ instead of ‘good boy’ when they do their tricks, or let me mess with their paws or something. It’s really changed our interactions — they’re much more patient with me trimming claws and suchlike.

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: